Tobin Harshaw is an opinions and editorials staff editor at the New York Times.
Harshaw has written on subjects ranging from the economy to the Tea Party movement to blogs over the past semester. His writing style shows the same strong background in reporting that the textbook 'Writing For Impact' demanded for opinions writing.
Harshaw does this by letting other people prove his points for him at times. In a January article about whether or not the recession was coming to an end, Harshaw uses the scepticism of multiple economists and business professionals to underscore his own.
Next, he draws out the counter argument from a Washington politicist--that inventory shifts are a natural part of economic returns.
Counter point made, he refutes that with more testimony from yet another expert. He says almost nothing directly through the entire article, but his opinion on the matter is both clear and backed up by evidence.
Another trick Harshaw uses effectively is the drawing question--Will Wall Street be Saved by Porn? , Assassinating Americans, Killing the Constitution? and Which Justice Will Prevail? are good examples of this.
Clever headlines and drawing ledes followed up with small-scale narratives such as the one about blogger Matthew Yglesias' opinion on President Obama and anti-terrorism techniques.
Harshaw is slightly snarky about his attitude while still complimenting Yglesias' writing skills. The trick makes him appear to be even tempered on the subject.
He explores both sides of the issue and discusses whether the Republicans are right to point out Obama's apparent disconnect between his stated stance on fighting and prosecuting terrorists and what he is actually doing.
Because of that, he arrives at middle of the road opinion on this story noting that Republicans are wrong to criticize Obama, but that his shift may jeopardize future movement towards prisoner rights.
Harshaw has other tricks besides those of a good writer or journalist. He is well aware of the capabilities of new media. In each of the above articles, he has several links to other stories where he gathered information, including rival newspapers and blogs.
Lastly, he finishes strong. Harshaw asks a single question at the beginning of his articles, goes into a narrative, zooms out to the broader spectrum and impact then draws a conclusion based on the information listed in the stories and testimonies gathered. The answers are definitive. Others allow for future development.
The techniques and patterns were all consistent to the writing style of an established professional. Harshaw is the kind of writer who has developed through a combination of experience and practice at the craft.
Monday, April 26, 2010
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Chapter 13
Journalists will eventually offend someone.
It doesn't matter whether they are hard news reporters, feature writers or columnists, writers cannot make everyone happy all the time. What they must do is make sure they maintain their credibility and the credibility of their institution.
Columnists have an obligation to report the truth. Despite that, chapter 13 states that the average award for a libel or privacy case at the time it was written was $2.9 million.
The First Amendment grants journalists a good working defence, but not immunity from law suits or loss of readership.
Libel is the biggest cause of this. Libel is defamation through published media that demonstratively harmed the plaintiff's reputation, and was published through the negligence, recklessness or intent to harm.
Truth is the best defence against libel, but only if it's documented or provable.
Qualified privilege is a secondary defence. When something is said in an official proceeding, such as a court case, and is quoted ver batim, it cannot be held against the reporter. Qualified privilege holds up even when it covers false or defaming information.
Fair comment on public proceedings is somewhat different. It is written as the right to comment on matters of public interest so long as they are fair and accurate.
Fair comment is the defence is often used as an umbrella defence for comments on public acts, proceedings, performances and appearances.
There are many strategies to use in order to avoid the courtroom and the need to use these defences at all.
Be journalistically sound, double-check facts, avoid cheap shots, question neutral reportage, remember no one is really "fair game" and handle all writing carefully.
Public figures have a harder time proving libel in the court room, but even if they lose, your institute still stands to lose time and money defending itself. So be fair to everyone and make sure that what you write about so-called public figures pertains to the part of their lives that is in the public's eyes.
Privacy is another matter, when is the story invasive and harmful? That is something every writer must ask when dealing with sensitive topics.
Finally, there is the ancient pitfalls of plagiarism and copyright violation.
Writers can cite other writers as long as they attribute fairly and don't take large portions of work. But doing so risks the loss of original thought. Information isn't copyrighted, but news stories are.
Writers can lift attributed quotes from copyrighted materials when commenting or critiquing them, but they cannot pass them off as their own. That is plagiarism, one of biggest taboos of journalism.
As long as writers treat every story with care and remember that lawsuits are a real possibility they can minimize their risks and maintain credibility in the journalism world.
It doesn't matter whether they are hard news reporters, feature writers or columnists, writers cannot make everyone happy all the time. What they must do is make sure they maintain their credibility and the credibility of their institution.
Columnists have an obligation to report the truth. Despite that, chapter 13 states that the average award for a libel or privacy case at the time it was written was $2.9 million.
The First Amendment grants journalists a good working defence, but not immunity from law suits or loss of readership.
Libel is the biggest cause of this. Libel is defamation through published media that demonstratively harmed the plaintiff's reputation, and was published through the negligence, recklessness or intent to harm.
Truth is the best defence against libel, but only if it's documented or provable.
Qualified privilege is a secondary defence. When something is said in an official proceeding, such as a court case, and is quoted ver batim, it cannot be held against the reporter. Qualified privilege holds up even when it covers false or defaming information.
Fair comment on public proceedings is somewhat different. It is written as the right to comment on matters of public interest so long as they are fair and accurate.
Fair comment is the defence is often used as an umbrella defence for comments on public acts, proceedings, performances and appearances.
There are many strategies to use in order to avoid the courtroom and the need to use these defences at all.
Be journalistically sound, double-check facts, avoid cheap shots, question neutral reportage, remember no one is really "fair game" and handle all writing carefully.
Public figures have a harder time proving libel in the court room, but even if they lose, your institute still stands to lose time and money defending itself. So be fair to everyone and make sure that what you write about so-called public figures pertains to the part of their lives that is in the public's eyes.
Privacy is another matter, when is the story invasive and harmful? That is something every writer must ask when dealing with sensitive topics.
Finally, there is the ancient pitfalls of plagiarism and copyright violation.
Writers can cite other writers as long as they attribute fairly and don't take large portions of work. But doing so risks the loss of original thought. Information isn't copyrighted, but news stories are.
Writers can lift attributed quotes from copyrighted materials when commenting or critiquing them, but they cannot pass them off as their own. That is plagiarism, one of biggest taboos of journalism.
As long as writers treat every story with care and remember that lawsuits are a real possibility they can minimize their risks and maintain credibility in the journalism world.
Thursday, April 8, 2010
Chapter 12
Chapter 12 is all about campus newspapers and student journalism.
The Red & Black and other campus newspapers are training grounds. This is where student journalists practice their crafts and build portfolios (without which they have virtually no chance at a job).
The first lessons in Campus writing are commitment and courage. The student must be willing to work under-staffed and without pay. Long hours and hard work are the simple reality of journalism. That's commitment.
Courage is writing editorials that may upset people in authority over the writer as a student. They must use ethical and sound principles of journalism, but they shouldn't back down either.
The Rice Thresher at Rice University is cited as doing a good job at this when it explores a U.S. Supreme Court finding that the university violated rules for financing sports equally based on gender.
The Thresher notes the different percentages and how to better fix the problem than simply throw more money at it. They also note that the inequality is not as severe as it was made out due to the largely shared use of facilities.
They did something else right to, they wrote about something that directly impacted the students. Student journalists should focus on stories that directly affect the readers, in most cases students and staff at their university.
Many points on good editorial writing brought up in earlier chapters are mentioned here. Other things to remember are that open record laws are there for our use, grammar is important and we must focus on short, central points.
Writers have to practice. The campus papers are an ideal place to start.
The Red & Black and other campus newspapers are training grounds. This is where student journalists practice their crafts and build portfolios (without which they have virtually no chance at a job).
The first lessons in Campus writing are commitment and courage. The student must be willing to work under-staffed and without pay. Long hours and hard work are the simple reality of journalism. That's commitment.
Courage is writing editorials that may upset people in authority over the writer as a student. They must use ethical and sound principles of journalism, but they shouldn't back down either.
The Rice Thresher at Rice University is cited as doing a good job at this when it explores a U.S. Supreme Court finding that the university violated rules for financing sports equally based on gender.
The Thresher notes the different percentages and how to better fix the problem than simply throw more money at it. They also note that the inequality is not as severe as it was made out due to the largely shared use of facilities.
They did something else right to, they wrote about something that directly impacted the students. Student journalists should focus on stories that directly affect the readers, in most cases students and staff at their university.
Many points on good editorial writing brought up in earlier chapters are mentioned here. Other things to remember are that open record laws are there for our use, grammar is important and we must focus on short, central points.
Writers have to practice. The campus papers are an ideal place to start.
Friday, April 2, 2010
Chapter 11 Summary
This time the book widens its focus again and looks at commentary for cyberspace and broadcast news.
The Internet is a medium that allows for long-form writing and a faster way to get stories to readers. Studies have shown that readers spend less time reading specific pages on a website. However, space is not at a premium like it is in newspapers and magazines.
This allows writers to go more in-depth in their coverage. The reader can choose to move on when ready, usually through hyper-links the writers place within their stories to related topics.
The Internet also provides a unique opportunity for bloggers. Here, anyone can be journalist and even a watch dog of the media. Jack Shafer is mentioned as an example for taking a New York Times article about sex slavery to task.
Journalists must use the Internet differently than papers and still maintain impact. Readers want information on the Internet now, not at 6 p.m.
Writers need to uses certain tricks to get that impact. One of the most important, is getting reader interaction. Writers can use comment boards, polls, slide shows, and live chats to achieve this. How far they go is really limited only by the amount of time they can put into it.
Broadcast news writing has other challenges. The author notes that Broadcast commentary is disappearing. This is in part due to profit-driven radio and what the listeners want to here.
When it is possible to give commentary on the radio, the writers must use sparing language that is good for the ears, not the eyes. Pacing and understanding is important. In short, say it in 150-200 words, not 500.
The Internet is a medium that allows for long-form writing and a faster way to get stories to readers. Studies have shown that readers spend less time reading specific pages on a website. However, space is not at a premium like it is in newspapers and magazines.
This allows writers to go more in-depth in their coverage. The reader can choose to move on when ready, usually through hyper-links the writers place within their stories to related topics.
The Internet also provides a unique opportunity for bloggers. Here, anyone can be journalist and even a watch dog of the media. Jack Shafer is mentioned as an example for taking a New York Times article about sex slavery to task.
Journalists must use the Internet differently than papers and still maintain impact. Readers want information on the Internet now, not at 6 p.m.
Writers need to uses certain tricks to get that impact. One of the most important, is getting reader interaction. Writers can use comment boards, polls, slide shows, and live chats to achieve this. How far they go is really limited only by the amount of time they can put into it.
Broadcast news writing has other challenges. The author notes that Broadcast commentary is disappearing. This is in part due to profit-driven radio and what the listeners want to here.
When it is possible to give commentary on the radio, the writers must use sparing language that is good for the ears, not the eyes. Pacing and understanding is important. In short, say it in 150-200 words, not 500.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)